This is the full text of a   paper written by former president and current Pampanga representative   Gloria Macapagal Arroyo which was released to the media yesterday during a press briefing at the Manila Hotel. 
[I wrote this  article on and off in my  spare time during my house recuperation,  re-hospitalization and  hospital detention from October to December  2011.] 
Part 3 of 4 
Infrastructure
Infrastructure strengthens our  competitiveness and enables us to attract new levels of jobcreating  foreign direct investment. Infrastructure investment not only drives  economic growth, but also creates a more efficient, competitive economy,  by improving productivity and lowering the costs of doing business. 
I am alarmed that the pace of  infrastructure build-out has slowed dramatically under this  Administration, with some projects even being cancelled outright for no  good reason—such as the earlier-noted flood control projects in Central  Luzon—and our country being sued by investors. At a time when we should  be wooing their money, we are inviting litigation from them instead.  This kind of flip-flopping may help explain the tepid investor response  to the Administration’s flagship public-private partnership (PPP)  program, where only one project has been awarded after all of eighteen  months. 
I was heartened to hear the President  announce recently his willingness to resume government infrastructure  spending next year. However, one cannot help but notice the timing, so  close to the upcoming 2013 election campaign. 
Land productivity
In my first State of the Nation  Address in 2001, I said that the first component of our national agenda  should be an economic philosophy of free enterprise appropriate to the  twenty-first century, while the second should be a modernized  agricultural sector founded on social equity. 
Within a couple of months after taking  office in January 2001, I personally conducted Cabinet meetings to  implement the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act of 1995, which  had never been implemented for lack of funds. After several discussions  with selected department secretaries as well as heads of government  banks, we uncovered budget items and available credit to channel more  than P20 billion a year to provide fertilizers, irrigation and  infrastructure, extension services, more loans, dryers and other  post-harvest facilities, and seeds and other genetic materials to our  farmers and fisherfolk. This was perhaps the biggest reason for the  decline in poverty that was posted during my first few years in office. 
The current Administration originally  fixated on the single goal of achieving self-sufficiency in rice by  2013. I too wanted to achieve rice self-sufficiency, but I knew the odds  were tough. Since the Spanish period we’ve been importing rice. While  we may know how to grow rice well, topography doesn’t always cooperate.  Nature did not gift us with a mighty Mekong River like Thailand and  Vietnam, with their vast and naturally fertile river delta plains.  Nature instead put our islands ahead of our neighbors in the path of  typhoons from the Pacific. So historically we’ve had to import 10% of  our rice, and so I took care to keep our goals for agriculture  wideranging and diversified. 
Recently the Administration seems to  have retreated from the original objective of rice selfsufficiency by  2013. In its place, do they have an alternative vision in mind for our  all-important agricultural sector? 
The real challenge in this century is  broader. The real task at hand is to make the finite land that we have  planted to agriculture ever more productive, through agricultural  modernization founded on social equity. 
Higher productivity from farm lands is  critical for our development. By making more food available at lower  prices especially to our poor, we are effectively bringing down the  required level of real wages in our country—already among the highest in  the world, according to UP Professor Manny Esguerra—and helping to make  our manufacturing industries globally competitive again. 
As for social equity, being the  daughter of the late President Diosdado Macapagal, the father of land  reform in our country, I am gratified by the evaluation of one of my  favorite Economics teachers, UP Professor Gonzalo Jurado: “The  Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, to the extent that it is a land  distribution program, can now be described as having almost completely  succeeded in attaining its goal. [CARP] should now be a developmental  program aiming explicitly to raise farm productivity…so that the country  as a whole will benefit from the tenurial rearrangement.” And of course  it is the landowners who must set the example of compliance with the  law in order to allow the rest of us to move forward—such as the Arroyos  in my husband’s family, who voluntarily submitted long ago to land  reform even without an order from the Supreme Court to do the right  thing. 
See Part 4 of 4
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment